So apart from majoring in journalism in my Arts degree I am also majoring in Zoology in Science so the recent story about the death of the white rhinos at Dubbo zoo really sparked my interest. If you haven't read the story here is a link:
http://www.news.com.au/national/dubbo-zoo-mourns-loss-of-four-white-rhinos/story-e6frfkwi-1226306101785
Basically four rhinos died for unknown reasons at the Western Plains Zoo, Dubbo. Scientists and vets are still trying to figure out exactly why. With only 14,500 of these animals left this is a real scare for everyone. Could there be a new disease spreading that will wipe out the population? Rhinos in other zoos, like the ones up here at Australia Zoo, are now being closely monitored.
Thursday, 29 March 2012
Week 5 Lecture - Sound
Sound is something I think I have underestimated for a long time when it comes to ways of telling a story. I am naturally a writer and therefore the majority of stories I tell are written with perhaps a few photos. This weeks lecture really changed my perspective of the significance of sound and the way it can be used to create a powerful story for listeners.
Richard made a really good point that radio (which is the main way we use sound to tell stories) is much more intimate than TV, and includes you rather than coming at you. I found myself nodding as I listened to this, noting that while I was sitting listening to this interview I was also having a cup of tea and munching on a biscuit. It feels very noninvasive and captures more of my attention than TV. Maybe this is because there is no picture to distract me.
Richard also mentioned that often the best people to interview in fact just ordinary people like you and me. People who are not necessarily famous but who have interesting stories and who can evoke emotion from the listener. I took note of this too because we will soon be beginning our Factual Story Telling assignment. Bruce also mentioned something along the same lines in one of our first lectures: You can tell an amazing story from anyone if you know enough about them.
I guess the trick is to make them feel comfortable and that they can trust you.
I was pleasantly surprised to discover that radio is in fact not in decline but increasing in popularity. As mentioned in the first interview it is one of the oldest media forms but it is keeping up in our 'new media' world of today. With technologies like podcasts and the fact that people can multitask really easily while listening it sounds like radio is a form of story telling not to be underestimated!
Finally here are some notes of interest that I took down while listening to this week's lecture:
- The interviewer should be genuinely interested in the story
- The way you ask questions is very important
- Give guests space and time to speak
- Don't be afraid of silence
- Listeners can tell if you're lying or being fake on radio
- Enunciation matters
- Don't do anything on radio that you wouldn't do in real life
- A good radio story creates emotions and responses
- DON'T GIVE UP IF YOU REALLY WANT IT!!!
Richard made a really good point that radio (which is the main way we use sound to tell stories) is much more intimate than TV, and includes you rather than coming at you. I found myself nodding as I listened to this, noting that while I was sitting listening to this interview I was also having a cup of tea and munching on a biscuit. It feels very noninvasive and captures more of my attention than TV. Maybe this is because there is no picture to distract me.
Richard also mentioned that often the best people to interview in fact just ordinary people like you and me. People who are not necessarily famous but who have interesting stories and who can evoke emotion from the listener. I took note of this too because we will soon be beginning our Factual Story Telling assignment. Bruce also mentioned something along the same lines in one of our first lectures: You can tell an amazing story from anyone if you know enough about them.
I guess the trick is to make them feel comfortable and that they can trust you.
I was pleasantly surprised to discover that radio is in fact not in decline but increasing in popularity. As mentioned in the first interview it is one of the oldest media forms but it is keeping up in our 'new media' world of today. With technologies like podcasts and the fact that people can multitask really easily while listening it sounds like radio is a form of story telling not to be underestimated!
Finally here are some notes of interest that I took down while listening to this week's lecture:
- The interviewer should be genuinely interested in the story
- The way you ask questions is very important
- Give guests space and time to speak
- Don't be afraid of silence
- Listeners can tell if you're lying or being fake on radio
- Enunciation matters
- Don't do anything on radio that you wouldn't do in real life
- A good radio story creates emotions and responses
- DON'T GIVE UP IF YOU REALLY WANT IT!!!
Tuesday, 27 March 2012
Assignment: Media Diary and Analysis
The youth of today
live in a very different world to their grandparents and even
parents. If the words Ipod, Mac, Tablet or Facebook had been used
back when our parents were young it would have been met with a raised
eyebrow and quizzical look. What the hell are you talking about?
But in the 21st
century these have become everyday words and they have integrated
themselves so heavily into our society that many people would
struggle to get through even one day without them.
I do not pretend
to be an exception to this rule. Recently I took a diary of my entire
media use and production for ten days, taking note of exactly which
media I used and produced and for how long. My results showed me that I spent at
minimum an eighth of my day using or producing media and at most over
half of my entire day. The details of my results can be seen in the
table below.
From
this graph we can conclude that I am a modern day media
consumption/production freak but how do I compare with most other
people my age? Do most people rely on their TVs and computers
as much as I do? And if so,
what does this media reliance mean for us all?
A survey was
conducted of 432 people all currently undertaking the JOUR1111
subject at the Univeristy of Queensland to answer several media use
and consumption questions. I have used some of the results from this
survey to answer my questions above.
From this graph we
can see that the majority (29.9%) of people surveyed watch 1-2 hours
of TV a day and a staggering 94.9% watch at least some TV every day.
My TV consumption per day is just over 3 hours, putting me in a relatively small category of high TV consumers (4.9%).
Next I was
interested to see how I compare when it comes to computer use and
production.
In this case I am with the majority of my peers, spending between 2-3 hours on the computer each day (see graph below). It is remarkable to note here that 96.8% of people surveyed spend over 1 hour on the computer every day. That is a lot of data being both consumed and produced via this new technology.
But what does this
change mean for everyone? As a future journalist how does this
influence the way I communicate and receive news and other
information?
The results of
the survey above, showing where the majority of JOUR1111 students get
their news from, comes as no surprise. The majority of people get
their news either from the computer (via online newspapers, Twitter
or Facebook,) or from the TV and this correlates perfectly with the
amount of time spent on the computer and watching TV. We can
therefore assume that whatever media people use most of, is where
they get the majority of their news from.
While some may
think that new media is taking over our lives and one day we will
rely on it so heavily that we will become the ultimate couch
potatoes, I can think of a much more positive perspective. New media
has given us the ability to consume and produce media on a much
larger scale. This means, as a journalist, if I have something to say
or a story to tell I have the potential to reach people all around
the world at the click of a finger. I no longer have to grovel to a
newspaper publisher or wait to be interviewed on the radio or the
television (though these are still both great things to aim for).
Ultimately it gives journalists more flexibility to tell a story how
we want to (the internet allows for videos/slideshows/photo slides),
as quickly we want, and perhaps most importantly, to reach the people
who will be interested.
Thursday, 22 March 2012
Watermelons as Art, Who would have thought?
So this was forwarded to me by a friend and seeing as we have been looking at picture stories and photography this week in JOUR1111 I couldn't resist putting it up. Below are a series of photos from a watermelon festival in Italy at the end of 2011. Who knew you could do so much with a watermelon?!
Tuesday, 20 March 2012
Week 4 Lecture - Picture Stories
Lecture 4 Reflection: Picture Stories
This week's lecture was all about
telling a story through pictures. As I posted at the very end of last
week's blog, I have a keen interest in photographic journalism and so
I was excited to learn more about it this week. I took this image
from the lecture slide as I liked it and thought it was worth
sharing.
We learnt that pictures have been used
to tell stories for over 40000 years with Australian Aborigines being
among the first users. Holy books such as The Book of Kells (which I
have seen) in the year 800 used mostly pictures, as the majority of
people couldn't read. Also stained glass was used to tell stories.
Photography only emerged as part of a newspaper in 1879 and the first
published news photo didn't occur until 1880. Now photos dominate our
world, they are everywhere!
I actually found the short clip Dr
Redman showed us of the woman being photo-shopped into a supermodel
really powerful. If you haven't seen it watch it now! Click on the
link below!
“No wonder our perception of beauty
is distorted.”
Self-image and self-confidence of both
women and men are so often lowered by these images and they (like me
before I saw how much editing was involved in that one picture) think
this is real. I for one struggled a lot with self-image through high
school and so being able to see how much manipulation goes on in a
picture helps remind me that what I perceive as real, actually is
not. That woman was just like anybody else before they put make-up on
her, did her hair, made her eyes twice as big, her neck a little
longer, her lips fuller and so on. Basically they changed everything
that made her her! You can't get much more sickening really! The
other thing is video shows us is that photographic manipulation is
now commonly used and virtually unnoticeable. A scary thought to me! Here are some more examples incase anyone didn't get enough in the lecture.
Once again new media technology has
allowed for more flexibility with images and videos. We now have
better quality photos, galleries rather than single images and easy
ways to give and receive them (on the internet or by downloading).
Here's an interesting question I
thought of while in the lecture: What would you prefer to look at if
you had the same photo and it was the same quality, a hard copy of
it, or an image of it on a computer?
Perhaps I'm old school but I still feel
like there is something more satisfying about holding a photo in your
hand, or seeing it on the wall.
My thoughts on the three different
photos of Jonathan Thurston (as I am not at the lectures to discuss
it):
I found the first one to be the worst
of the three, not particularly interesting to look at as Jonathan is
in the background, only just visible. The second was much more
intriguing because of the interesting angle from behind the cross.
The last one was the most engaging me though, with so many people
focusing on Jonathan and looking so sad and unhappy it captures my
attention straight away and gets me asking lots of questions to
myself.
Another topic discussed in the lecture
was what makes a good photo to which we discovered: Frame, focus,
angle and point of view, exposure, timing (sport photo), capture the
moment (find some great photos)
I have therefore endeavored to find
some pictures on the internet that fulfill some of these criteria.
They are located below. Finally I just
wanted to mention this quote from the lecture as I thought it was
true and worth thinking about.
“A picture has no meaning if it can't
tell a story”
Angle and Point of View:
Frame:
Timing:
Exposure (lighting):
Capture the moment:
Focus:
Monday, 19 March 2012
Week 3 Lecture - Text
Lecture 3 Reflection:
So this week we had a guest lecturer,
accomplished journalist Skye Doherty come in to talk to us about the
power of text. Because I do not attend any of the actual lectures I
was only able to hear her voice on the lecture recordings that Friday
and here is what I feel I have learnt from her.
First of all, I began to see text in a
whole new light. To see it more like a weapon, or a tool that can be
used to produce something in whatever way you desire. For a
journalist, this ability to structure text in a way that people will
want to read it, is vital. If we can't do that, then ultimately, we
suck. I have previously posted my reflections after reading about the
inverted pyramid in our weekly reading task and Skye went over this
in the lecture. These were my notes on how she structured it:
At the Top: Who, what, where,
when, how, why – it should also appeal to news values such as
conflict, international relations, death, power
In the middle: Develop ideas and
add background
The bottom: Detail about what's
happened
News is also structured differently
depending on where it is being read eg. newspapers are structured
differently to online news. Online we have the use of hypertexts that
allow readers freedom to visit related news, or certain aspects that
interest them and this format is very much the direction news is
taking. As modern journalists we must therefore market our stories in
a flexible way so that no matter what mode they are published in they
will be appealing.
Some overall tips I took from Skye:
- Use words efficiently to tell the storyteller
- There is a lot of teamwork involved in journalism
- What makes a person read your story: Images, subtext, headlines of varying lengths, short lead, strap, navigation headlines
- Getting it out there: tags, excerpts, metadata for search engines, keywords
Thanks Skye for coming along and
talking to us!
I would also just like to quickly
apologise if my blog appears a little scattered right now. I was a
little confused as to how the whole blog thing worked (I think there
were a few of us), so dates and so on are a little muddled up as I
have added past lecture reflections.
I missed out on Jellybeans :(
Lecture 2:
This last week has been a bit of a
shake-up for me as I found out I will no longer be able to attend
lectures due its rescheduling and consequent clash with another of my
subjects. After an initial freak-out I was reassured by the man
himself (Dr Redman) that I will be just fine if I listen to lectures
via Lectopia each week. I have therefore dedicated each Tuesday
morning to lying bed listening to my JOUR1111 lecture.
So this week's lecture focused on news,
with emphasis on “old media” and “new media.” Many forms of
old media such as radio, newspapers, television and magazines are
beginning to lose popularity in favour of new technological ways of
communicating, namely on the internet. When I think of my own media
uses I agreed with what was being said. The comparison between Web
1.0, Web 2.0 and the newly emerging Web 3.0 was a large focus of the
lecture. While Web 1.0 is a maybe a species destined for extinction
Web 2.0 is thriving in the 21st century with the invention
of social networking site like Facebook, Myspace, Twitter. However
there is now a new beast arriving on the scene (I was unaware of this
up until today) that will change how we use the internet once again.
It will allow for much more individual and personalised information
and when I first heard this it all seemed a little scary to me. Too
personal perhaps.
So this was all interesting stuff but I
was wondering how it related to me, in this course, doing journalism.
But of course I soon found out it relates a heck of
a lot to journalism as it changes how news and media reaches people,
is exchanged and shared. If we are now getting most of our news
online and without having to pay much, if anything, for it then how
do journalists get paid for their stories? Do we have a job?
It is
indeed an exciting time to be a journalist, as Dr Redman told us last
week. I do believe there is a bright future for journalism, it is
just a new one that must be adjusted to and we will have to continue
adjusting. I can now understand why we will be keeping a blog and
getting a Twitter account. Its all part of the process of being a
journalist in the 21st
century.
On a
different note, I'd like to post a link to an article I read about a
photographic journalist working for National Geographic. I've often
dreamed of being a journalist along these lines and I found what she
had to say honest and interesting. While many people may think its a
job where you simply wonder around taking thousands of photos until
you get a few good ones, there is a lot more hard work involved than
that, not to mention a lot of stress with deadlines to meet and money
budgets. By the end of the article though I was thinking, “wow, she
has a pretty amazing job. Hard work, but hopefully rewarding.” Have
a read if you've ever considered photographic journalism or even
travel journalism.
Also
this website allows you display your own photo journalism portfolios
and features some amazing photographs. I would love to be able to go
to some of these places and bring back stories to share. Here's the
link to the website if you want to have a look at some of the
photography other than the ones below.
“A
picture tells a thousand words” - I couldn't agree more!
YOU are the Journalist!
Lecture 1 Reflection:
So I attended my first JOUR1111 Lecture
yesterday, met my lecturer for the course, Dr Bruce Redman, and found
out a little bit about what lies ahead for me. We got straight into
it and I liked the quote used “YOU are the Journalist.” I was
excited by these words straight away because, really, what other way
are we going to learn to be journalists if we aren't treated and
thought of as such from the beginning.
We looked at a few quotes given by
different people aiming to describe or give their views on journalism
before discussing the issues facing journalism in today's world. I
had actually given very little thought to how journalism is changing
and being challenged at present. With the ever-increasing rise in
technology and older media such as newspapers being used less and
less, was the need for journalism dying off? Dr Redman however,
ensured us that indeed it was not (much to my relief)! Only that it
is changing and will continue to change.
Finally we were given an overview about
what this course is about and what it aims to equip its students
with. I got a glimpse of the assessment pieces (of which the blogging
seemed the scariest to me. I've never done anything like this before)
and the tutors for the course and I left feeling both excited and a
little nervous.
Monday, 12 March 2012
Week 3 Reading Reflection
This week's readings were based on two
important topics in the world of journalism. That of writing well and
also the knowledge of what to write. The first topic, that of writing
'well', I have often struggled to fully understand, as I believe
writing style and what is enjoyable to read is a personal thing and
varies hugely from person to person. How can writing be judged as
good or bad? And how can one type of writing be the way we should all
write and be the most enjoyable to read? Unless of course there are
obvious errors like bad grammar, misspellings or bad vocabulary
writing style is individual and in my opinion that is what makes it
so interesting. We do not all like to read the same things whether
they be books or the different sections of paper. Therefore as I
began reading the article Convergent Journalism: An Introduction
by Stephen Quinn & Vincent F. Filak I
was sceptical as to its relevance.
However
by the end I was pleasantly surprised. The article focused not so
much on changing writing style but on the following valuable
journalistic points:
- Always gain as much background as possible on your subject
- Ensure you capture the many different views surrounding a topic, not just the black and white
- Use as many sources as possible
- Use creativity to add depth to what you write
Another
fundamental technique in journalism that I learnt and am looking
forward to applying is the of the inverted pyramid. The second
article Journalism Studies by Horst Pottker gave
background on the possible ways in which the inverted pyramid was
created. I learnt that this invention is a highly valuable tool that
will ensure I focus on writing about what matters most to the people
reading. Here is what the inverted pyramid has taught me:
- Begin with the five w's and the h (who, what, where, when, why and how)
- Beware of too many details or “notebook empyting”
- Organize facts by their importance to the story being told
- Make every sentence matter
- Wrap-up the story so that its obvious there is no more to say
The
last third of the article focused on editing and as I am considering
editing/publishing as a career path I paid particular attention to
this part. I took note of some of the ideas given to help improve
editing skills and have once again listed them below:
- Print out and read your story on paper
- Read your work outloud
- Don't be afraid to consult the dictionary
- Be your harshest critic
- Know 'why' you have done something the way you have
It was
great to read not how to 'write better' as such but how to become a
better, more conscious journalist. I also became conscious that while
we may all have our unique writing style there are techniques that
must be used in order to establish connection with the reader and
thus make a story interesting. I look forward to putting what I have
learnt into practice later on!
To
finish I would just like to quote from Convergent
Journalism: An Introduction by Stephen Quinn & Vincent F. Filak
on the topic of figuring out
what to write first. I will certainly remember this when I sit down
to write my next article, “Imagine coming home and your room mate
tells you 'Your mum called. Your Dad was in a car accident.' If you
screamed, 'What happened?' and your room mate started with 'The
Centerville Police Department responded to a report of an
accident...' you'd likely cut your room mate off mid sentence and
demand to know if anyone was hurt, how bad the damage was, and what
caused the crash. When seen in these terms, what should come first
seems to be common sense.”
Week Two
So week two of university is now underway and I'm beginning to get the hang of things. The words Blackboard, Tut, PASS, Echo360 and inverted pyramid have all taken on a new meaning. After attending my first tutorial I got started on my media use diary and have been having a lot of fun with it. Its amazing to see how much of my day is taken up with media use, its far more than I expected! I should be finished recording my diary in a few more days and then I will start comparing my results with the rest of the class. I can see things are going to start getting busy soon!
Thursday, 8 March 2012
Time to start blogging
So after some initial difficulties I have finally set up my first blog! So far I have enjoyed JOUR1111 and have not found it too daunting. I don't have much to post about yet but I did watch Kony 2012 last night and thought it was worth putting up as a link on my blog. If you haven't already seen it, watch it now!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4MnpzG5Sqc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4MnpzG5Sqc
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)