Well ladies and gentlemen this will be my last blog for my JOUR1111 course at UQ. I thought I'd take the time to reflect on some memories and also what I have learnt since starting back in February.
This semester has been my first of university and after a year off after high school it was a shock to the system. On the first lecture for JOUR1111 I can remember Bruce Redman telling all of us about our assessment pieces for the semester and what we would be studying. I'm not going to lie, I was daunted by it. Particularly as to this blog. We had to reflect back on our lectures each week and post online! Serious?! I'd never looked at or made a blog before this one and I was pretty nervous about it at the start. I can remember sitting at the keyboard not sure what I should be writing. Reflecting on lectures was one thing, but then putting personal stuff on as well?
Well as you can probably see over the months I've posted a lot of random thoughts/ things that have interested me while I've been undertaking journalism. This blog has turned into a diary of sorts, or a place where I can write down my thoughts on whatever I feel like. It has become so much easier as I've become more comfortable and familiar with it. I even know how to upload video clips on here now! This was something that had me stumped for a while.
What else have I learnt since I started journalism? I've met some really great people in this course and had a lot of fun doing the Factual Storytelling Exercise. I've also learnt there are so many branches of journalism: investigative, photo, political, scientific, international. There are several that spark my interest already. I am thinking my dream job would be to work as a science journalist for National Geographic or something similar.
I have also become more aware of how journalism is evolving through technology and what a huge influence this has. Not only do we find journalism in newspapers, radio and magazines, but endlessly online! The new Web. 3.0 is the next step in journalism's evolutionary journey. News travels faster than fire these days. As fast as the click of a mouse and there is an ever growing audience of like-people to contact.
I'd really like to thank all the people who have helped build this course into a very enjoyable and interactive introduction to journalism. The lecturers, tutors and fellow peers have helped give me a great grounding in what will be an exciting few years ahead!
Lastly, I'd like to reflect on my most vivid memory during journalism.
It was during one of my tutorials with Ali Rae. We were covering the
topic of ethics in journalism and she brought up this picture:
This photograph showing a starving
Sudanese child being stalked by a vulture won Kevin Carter the 1994
Pulitzer Prize for feature
photography.
This photograph really made me think about my morals and what would I have done in Kevin's place? There is no right or wrong answer. Do you have ethics as a journalist that are different to your ethics as a person? I still don't know if I have the answer to that question. The discussion in our tutorial afterwards was fascinating to me. Hearing different people's opinions. Should Kevin have saved the child? Should he have not photographed the scene? Should he have waited for the vulture to come closer? I have thought about it many times since!
Once again thank you to everyone involved in organising JOUR1111!
Wednesday, 13 June 2012
Monday, 11 June 2012
The Manslater
Sunday, 10 June 2012
Miss Universe Australia 2012
Having not watched TV or read much news for the last five days (I've been camping) I turned on the TV news this morning to find out the winner for Miss Universe Australia 2012 had just been announced last night. I've never been a follower of the beauty pageants or Miss Universe (Jennifer Hawkins is the only winner I know) and I have generally had the opinion that most of the competitors are blonde bimbos with little personality or intelligence. Harsh? Well this morning I decided to give the latest Miss Universe Australia a fair chance so I watched her interview with Mel and Kochieon Sunrise.
I'm sorry to say that she looked every inch the blonde bimbo I had expected. What can expect though if its a beauty pageant? When asked what she wanted to do she gave the answer that she couldn't 'wait to travel the world' and represent Australia in the international Miss Universe 2012. So original....
On the plus side her voice wasn't the whiny, 'I'm so cute' sort that so many models put on. Unfortunately I found little originality about her and it leads me to wondering what the criteria for winning a beauty pageant actually is. Obviously all the girls who enter it must be beautiful, skinny and have long hair and tanned skin so what makes a girl like Renae Ayris stand out? I certainly didn't pick it during her Sunrise interview.
Well according to the Herald Sun 'Ms Ayris impressed judges, including actor Vince Colosimo, designer Wayne Cooper and Dancing with the Stars choreographer Jason Coleman, in her glittering silver and white evening gown and purple bikini.'
So, it wasn't Renae who was the winner, it was what she was wearing? That's what it seems more like to me. If someone else had worn her clothes would they have won instead? Many beauty pageants claim they choose their winners on 'inner beauty' as well as their good looks but I didn't see any mention of that. Surely if we are choosing someone to represent Australia we want them to be able to speak well and have an attractive personality. For now I'm still at a loss as to why beauty pageants are run and what makes a winner.
I'm sorry to say that she looked every inch the blonde bimbo I had expected. What can expect though if its a beauty pageant? When asked what she wanted to do she gave the answer that she couldn't 'wait to travel the world' and represent Australia in the international Miss Universe 2012. So original....
On the plus side her voice wasn't the whiny, 'I'm so cute' sort that so many models put on. Unfortunately I found little originality about her and it leads me to wondering what the criteria for winning a beauty pageant actually is. Obviously all the girls who enter it must be beautiful, skinny and have long hair and tanned skin so what makes a girl like Renae Ayris stand out? I certainly didn't pick it during her Sunrise interview.
Well according to the Herald Sun 'Ms Ayris impressed judges, including actor Vince Colosimo, designer Wayne Cooper and Dancing with the Stars choreographer Jason Coleman, in her glittering silver and white evening gown and purple bikini.'
So, it wasn't Renae who was the winner, it was what she was wearing? That's what it seems more like to me. If someone else had worn her clothes would they have won instead? Many beauty pageants claim they choose their winners on 'inner beauty' as well as their good looks but I didn't see any mention of that. Surely if we are choosing someone to represent Australia we want them to be able to speak well and have an attractive personality. For now I'm still at a loss as to why beauty pageants are run and what makes a winner.
Monday, 4 June 2012
Looking to the sky!
The first partial eclipse of the year appeared in the sky last night for those lucky enough to witness it. For residents of Australia, Asia and and North America it was amazing to see the one third of the moons surface go an eerie black. It makes us remember how small we really are.
Tomorrow there is actually a transit of Venus across the sun that won't occur again in our lifetime! Australians are in a good position to see this rare event that won't occur again until 2117. Because Venus is such a large planet its transit across the sun will be more impressive to watch than the smaller and more common transit of other planets like Mercury. So get your sunglasses on tomorrow morning and have a look!
All this talk about transit and eclipses got me interested in finding out just how rare these sights are and what is the difference between the many different eclipses, transits, etc.Well according to (Earthsky, 2012) there are about seven eclipses per year. Some, like the one witnesses last night are only partial eclipses, but there are also lunar, solar and total eclipses too. Of course where someone is located on the planet has a lot to do with whether these events can be seen. Different eclipses can only be seen in certain parts of the world. For Australians we are lucky to enough to be able to see two eclipses this year. One was last night night and the next is a penumberal eclipse on the 28 November (Earthsky, 2012). Penumberal eclipses are unfortunately deemed the least impressive of the eclipses with many people unable to see them with the naked eye. If you want to see the more impressive total lunar eclipse I'm afraid you're going to have to wait until April 2014 and then buy yourself a plane ticket over to North America.
References
Earthsky. 30 May 2012. The next eclipse is a partial eclipse of the moon. Retrieved from http://earthsky.org/
Partial Lunar Eclipse
Tomorrow there is actually a transit of Venus across the sun that won't occur again in our lifetime! Australians are in a good position to see this rare event that won't occur again until 2117. Because Venus is such a large planet its transit across the sun will be more impressive to watch than the smaller and more common transit of other planets like Mercury. So get your sunglasses on tomorrow morning and have a look!
A planet transit across the sun
All this talk about transit and eclipses got me interested in finding out just how rare these sights are and what is the difference between the many different eclipses, transits, etc.Well according to (Earthsky, 2012) there are about seven eclipses per year. Some, like the one witnesses last night are only partial eclipses, but there are also lunar, solar and total eclipses too. Of course where someone is located on the planet has a lot to do with whether these events can be seen. Different eclipses can only be seen in certain parts of the world. For Australians we are lucky to enough to be able to see two eclipses this year. One was last night night and the next is a penumberal eclipse on the 28 November (Earthsky, 2012). Penumberal eclipses are unfortunately deemed the least impressive of the eclipses with many people unable to see them with the naked eye. If you want to see the more impressive total lunar eclipse I'm afraid you're going to have to wait until April 2014 and then buy yourself a plane ticket over to North America.
References
Earthsky. 30 May 2012. The next eclipse is a partial eclipse of the moon. Retrieved from http://earthsky.org/
Thursday, 31 May 2012
Khan Academy: An Online Education
During my first semester of university I've been participating in a Chem1090 course so I can enter into a dual degree of Science/Arts next semester. Cramming two years of high school chemistry into one semester of uni has meant a lot of information is thrown at us and we must take the initiative to go home and do more in-depth learning of what is being taught.
In one of my PASS sessions a website called Khan Academy was mentioned to me. It is run by a man called Salman Khan who basically teaches a variety of subjects like maths, science and finance through online videos. I went on to the website, wondering how useful it would really be. After watching a few lessons on parts of my chemistry course that I was having trouble with I couldn't believe what a gold mine I had found! He takes viewers through different processes step by step and explains things in such simple terms compared to in lectures. I really can't thank Sal, as he calls himself, enough for helping me both learn and enjoy chemistry as much as I have.
I turned on the TV the other morning and was amazed to see him being interviewed on Sunrise. Through the interview I discovered his online website aims to educate those who live in remote areas who do not have access to a teacher or school. His website has been viewed over 50 million times and is now being used all around the world. So who is this guy? How does he know so much STUFF and how to teach it so well? I watched an interview he did with Charlie Rose to find out. Here it is below.
So for anyone having trouble with any sort of mathematics, science or finance stuff try out this website and it will no doubt help you out! http://www.khanacademy.org/
In one of my PASS sessions a website called Khan Academy was mentioned to me. It is run by a man called Salman Khan who basically teaches a variety of subjects like maths, science and finance through online videos. I went on to the website, wondering how useful it would really be. After watching a few lessons on parts of my chemistry course that I was having trouble with I couldn't believe what a gold mine I had found! He takes viewers through different processes step by step and explains things in such simple terms compared to in lectures. I really can't thank Sal, as he calls himself, enough for helping me both learn and enjoy chemistry as much as I have.
I turned on the TV the other morning and was amazed to see him being interviewed on Sunrise. Through the interview I discovered his online website aims to educate those who live in remote areas who do not have access to a teacher or school. His website has been viewed over 50 million times and is now being used all around the world. So who is this guy? How does he know so much STUFF and how to teach it so well? I watched an interview he did with Charlie Rose to find out. Here it is below.
So for anyone having trouble with any sort of mathematics, science or finance stuff try out this website and it will no doubt help you out! http://www.khanacademy.org/
Monday, 28 May 2012
Week 13 - Guest Speaker: Steve Molk
So we had our very last JOUR1111 lecture this week. Its hard to believe my introductory journalism course is winding up, I can still remember my first lecture! Being told, 'you are the journalist!'
For our last lecture Bruce introduced us to a guest lecturer: Steve Molk. An IT professional who confesses he 'likes talking about TV' and wanted to be a media writer. He runs his own blog, writes articles often published by Fairfax and appears on several radio shows.
Today he talked to us about online and social media and his experiences. Being an avid Twitter man he reminded us of the power such a website has. Just last week it was through Twitter that the world learned of Michael Clarke's wedding. Some positive aspects of Twitter he highlighted: Engaging, not just one-way, interactive, opinionated, noisy, boils down to the facts, spreads news instantly.
As has been emphasised in previous lectures, Steve talked about the growing importance of online media for journalists. A degree in journalism will aid us with employment but we should be getting out there on the internet even as undergraduates and setting ourselves up. The internet and social media makes us much more employable if was can demonstrate our knowledge as a journalist. We can gain international exposure and without editors we can pitch our story in whatever way we choose. Getting news online gives us many different views, connects us straight with the source and allows us to interact with people who have similar interests. These are no doubt some of the reasons it has taken off.
I found Steve's story of Mia Freedman interesting. Once the editor of Dolly, Cleo and Cosmo she left her job and started a blog called Mamamia. Now five years later it has turned into a 'mini empire' with about twenty employees and nearly 900 000 viewers each month! After the lecture I went on to her website and found out a little more. Here it is:http://www.mamamia.com.au/
Steve also talked about his experiences as a blogger. He likes to talk about television that is topical and interesting to him. He takes whatever opportunities he can to interview people on television or who make television. One of his rules when watching any show is to give it at least three episodes before forming an opinion. He told us of his interview with Will Anderson last year and I was amazed to hear he asked for the interview over Twitter! I know I sometimes wonder how I will ever get in contact with anyone I want to interview so maybe I will try out this method! Steve's blog is still in its early stages but is growing steadily with some of his work now being published by Fairfax.
Something Steve said that I thought was worth writing down was, "The way we understand how information is given to us is going to impact the writers and journalists we become."
Thanks for the lecture Steve Molk!
For our last lecture Bruce introduced us to a guest lecturer: Steve Molk. An IT professional who confesses he 'likes talking about TV' and wanted to be a media writer. He runs his own blog, writes articles often published by Fairfax and appears on several radio shows.
Today he talked to us about online and social media and his experiences. Being an avid Twitter man he reminded us of the power such a website has. Just last week it was through Twitter that the world learned of Michael Clarke's wedding. Some positive aspects of Twitter he highlighted: Engaging, not just one-way, interactive, opinionated, noisy, boils down to the facts, spreads news instantly.
As has been emphasised in previous lectures, Steve talked about the growing importance of online media for journalists. A degree in journalism will aid us with employment but we should be getting out there on the internet even as undergraduates and setting ourselves up. The internet and social media makes us much more employable if was can demonstrate our knowledge as a journalist. We can gain international exposure and without editors we can pitch our story in whatever way we choose. Getting news online gives us many different views, connects us straight with the source and allows us to interact with people who have similar interests. These are no doubt some of the reasons it has taken off.
I found Steve's story of Mia Freedman interesting. Once the editor of Dolly, Cleo and Cosmo she left her job and started a blog called Mamamia. Now five years later it has turned into a 'mini empire' with about twenty employees and nearly 900 000 viewers each month! After the lecture I went on to her website and found out a little more. Here it is:http://www.mamamia.com.au/
Steve also talked about his experiences as a blogger. He likes to talk about television that is topical and interesting to him. He takes whatever opportunities he can to interview people on television or who make television. One of his rules when watching any show is to give it at least three episodes before forming an opinion. He told us of his interview with Will Anderson last year and I was amazed to hear he asked for the interview over Twitter! I know I sometimes wonder how I will ever get in contact with anyone I want to interview so maybe I will try out this method! Steve's blog is still in its early stages but is growing steadily with some of his work now being published by Fairfax.
Something Steve said that I thought was worth writing down was, "The way we understand how information is given to us is going to impact the writers and journalists we become."
Thanks for the lecture Steve Molk!
Wednesday, 23 May 2012
Investigative Journalist : John Pilger
In our last lecture Bruce Redman mentioned the name of a man called John Pilger. Both an investigative journalist and film-maker I decided to find out more....
John Pilger is a Sydney-born man whose career spans decades and various continents. He appears a man interested in exposing crimes against humanity and global injustices, issues that I believe should be in our news more often.
Here is a brief biography from the website: http://www.johnpilger.com/biography
Like many of his Australian generation, Pilger and two colleagues left for Europe in the early 1960s. They set up an ill-fated freelance 'agency' in Italy (with the grand title of 'Interep') and quickly went broke. Arriving in London, Pilger freelanced, then joined Reuters, moving to the Londo
n Daily Mirror, Britain's biggest selling newspaper, which was then changing to a serious tabloid.
He became chief foreign correspondent and reported from all over the world, covering numerous wars, notably Vietnam. Still in his twenties, he became the youngest journalist to receive Britain's highest award for journalism, Journalist of the Year and was the first to win it twice. Moving to the United States, he reported the upheavals there in the late 1960s and 1970s. He marched with America's poor from Alabama to Washington, following the assassination of Martin Luther King. He was in the same room when Robert Kennedy, the presidential candidate, was assassinated in June 1968.
His work in South East Asia produced a iconic issue of the London Mirror, devoted almost entirely to his world exclusive dispatches from Cambodia in the aftermath of Pol Pot's reign. The combined impact of his Mirror reports and his subsequent documentary, Year Zero: the Silent Death of Cambodia, raised almost $50 million for the people of that stricken country. Similarly, his 1994 documentary and dispatches report from East Timor, where he travelled under cover, helped galvanise support for the East Timorese, then occupied by Indonesia.
In Britain, his four-year investigation on behalf of a group of children damaged at birth by the drug Thalidomide, and left out of the settlement with the drugs company, resulted in a special settlement.
His numerous documentaries on Australia, notably The Secret Country (1983), the bicentary trilogy The Last Dream (1988) and Welcome to Australia (1999) all celebrated and revealed much of his own country's 'forgotten past', especially its indigenous past and present.
He has won an Emmy and a BAFTA for his documentaries, which have also won numerous US and European awards, such as as the Royal Television Society's Best Documentary.
What an amazing guy!! He is certainly a great example of what an exciting and rewarding career a journalist can have. If you would like to watch any of the videos he's made here's a link to them: http://www.johnpilger.com/filmography
Tuesday, 22 May 2012
A closer look at cliches
Ever wondered how a phrase or cliché was first made? A leopard cannot change its spots, All's well that ends well, Don't look a gift horse in the mouth. During my writing course I've come across a few of these and it got me thinking and wondering who thought of them and why have they stuck? So I thought I'd find out the origins and meanings of some my favourite and most popular phrases and cliches.
Straight from the horses mouth
Meaning - From the highest authority
Origin -In horse racing circles tips on which horse is a likely winner circulate amongst punters. The most trusted authorities are considered to be those in closest touch with the recent form of the horse, i.e. stable lads, trainers etc. The notional 'from the horse's mouth' is supposed to indicate one step better than even that inner circle, i.e. the horse itself.
Wild goose chase
Meaning - A hopeless quest
Origin - The earlier meaning related to horse racing. A 'wild goose chase' was a chase in which horses followed a lead horse at a set distance, mimicking wild geese flying in formation.
Jump the gun
Meaning - Beginning something before before preparations for it are complete
Origin - Derives from track and field races and was preceded in the USA by the phrase 'beat the gun' (or pistol). This has been known from the early 20th century.
Loose cannon
Meaning - An unpredictable person or thing
Origin - From the 17th century to the 19th century, wooden warships carried cannon as their primary offensive weapons. In order to avoid damage from their enormous recoil when fired they were mounted on rollers and secured with rope. A loose cannon was just what it sounds like, that is, a cannon that had become free of its restraints and was rolling dangerously about the deck.
On Cloud Nine
Meaning - In a state of blissful happiness
Origin - A commonly heard explanation is that the expression originated as one of the classifications of cloud which were defined by the US Weather Bureau in the 1950s, in which 'Cloud Nine' denotes the fluffy cumulonimbus type that are considered so attractive. Another explanation is that the phrase derives from Buddhism and that Cloud Nine is one of the stages of the progress to enlightenment of a Bodhisattva (one destined to become a Buddha).
A square meal
Meaning - a substantial meal
Origin - It is frequently repeated, by tour guides and the like, that the expression 'a square meal' originated from the Royal Navy practice of serving meals on square wooden plates. Such plates did exist so that is a plausible story, but there's no other evidence to support it. The word square has many meanings, including 'proper, honest, straightforward', and that's the meaning in 'square meal'. This isn't a rectilinear meal on right-angled crockery, but a good and satisfying meal.
Spill the beans
Meaning - To divulge a secret
Origin - The derivation of this expression is said to be a voting system used in ancient Greece. The story goes that white beans indicated positive votes and black beans negative. Votes had to be unanimous, so if the collector 'spilled the beans' before the vote was complete and a black bean was seen, the vote was halted
Take the cake
Meaning - Carry off the honours
Origin - It is widely supposed that this phrase originated with cake-walk strutting competitions, which were commonplace in the black community of the southern USA in the 19th and early 20th centuries. In those, couples would be judged on their style in the 'cake-walk'. The winners were said to have 'taken the cake', which was often the prize.
On the wagon
Meaning - Abstaining from alcohol
Origin - Suggested explanations of the origin of 'on the wagon' focus on actual wagons that were used to transport people; for example, condemned prisoners who had taken their last drink in this life and were transported to the gallows by wagon.
The bees knees
Meaning - Excellent
Origin - Bees carry pollen back to the hive in sacs on their legs. Hence the phrases alludes to the concentration of goodness about the bees knees.
All meanings and origins of the phrases above were taken from
http://www.phrases.org.uk
Straight from the horses mouth
Meaning - From the highest authority
Origin -In horse racing circles tips on which horse is a likely winner circulate amongst punters. The most trusted authorities are considered to be those in closest touch with the recent form of the horse, i.e. stable lads, trainers etc. The notional 'from the horse's mouth' is supposed to indicate one step better than even that inner circle, i.e. the horse itself.
Wild goose chase
Meaning - A hopeless quest
Origin - The earlier meaning related to horse racing. A 'wild goose chase' was a chase in which horses followed a lead horse at a set distance, mimicking wild geese flying in formation.
Jump the gun
Meaning - Beginning something before before preparations for it are complete
Origin - Derives from track and field races and was preceded in the USA by the phrase 'beat the gun' (or pistol). This has been known from the early 20th century.
Loose cannon
Meaning - An unpredictable person or thing
Origin - From the 17th century to the 19th century, wooden warships carried cannon as their primary offensive weapons. In order to avoid damage from their enormous recoil when fired they were mounted on rollers and secured with rope. A loose cannon was just what it sounds like, that is, a cannon that had become free of its restraints and was rolling dangerously about the deck.
On Cloud Nine
Meaning - In a state of blissful happiness
Origin - A commonly heard explanation is that the expression originated as one of the classifications of cloud which were defined by the US Weather Bureau in the 1950s, in which 'Cloud Nine' denotes the fluffy cumulonimbus type that are considered so attractive. Another explanation is that the phrase derives from Buddhism and that Cloud Nine is one of the stages of the progress to enlightenment of a Bodhisattva (one destined to become a Buddha).
A square meal
Meaning - a substantial meal
Origin - It is frequently repeated, by tour guides and the like, that the expression 'a square meal' originated from the Royal Navy practice of serving meals on square wooden plates. Such plates did exist so that is a plausible story, but there's no other evidence to support it. The word square has many meanings, including 'proper, honest, straightforward', and that's the meaning in 'square meal'. This isn't a rectilinear meal on right-angled crockery, but a good and satisfying meal.
Spill the beans
Meaning - To divulge a secret
Origin - The derivation of this expression is said to be a voting system used in ancient Greece. The story goes that white beans indicated positive votes and black beans negative. Votes had to be unanimous, so if the collector 'spilled the beans' before the vote was complete and a black bean was seen, the vote was halted
Take the cake
Meaning - Carry off the honours
Origin - It is widely supposed that this phrase originated with cake-walk strutting competitions, which were commonplace in the black community of the southern USA in the 19th and early 20th centuries. In those, couples would be judged on their style in the 'cake-walk'. The winners were said to have 'taken the cake', which was often the prize.
On the wagon
Meaning - Abstaining from alcohol
Origin - Suggested explanations of the origin of 'on the wagon' focus on actual wagons that were used to transport people; for example, condemned prisoners who had taken their last drink in this life and were transported to the gallows by wagon.
The bees knees
Meaning - Excellent
Origin - Bees carry pollen back to the hive in sacs on their legs. Hence the phrases alludes to the concentration of goodness about the bees knees.
All meanings and origins of the phrases above were taken from
http://www.phrases.org.uk
Monday, 21 May 2012
Week 12 - Investigative Journalism
Just the title of the topic for this week's lecture had me excited. Who wouldn't want to be an investigative journalist, uncovering buried stories and exposing them to the world? We began the lecture with looking at the in's of investigative journalism:
- Intelligence - money sex and power often comes up in investigative journalism
- Informed - research and get the facts
- Intuitive - use your gut feeling
- Inside - get on the inside
- Invest - invest a lot of yourself
I found it interesting that there were four different definitions given for investigative journalism, all of which I agreed with. I have written them below.
Definition 1: Critical and thorough journalism
Definition 2: Custodians of conscience
Definition 3: Provide a voice for those without one and hold the powerful to account
Defintion 4: Government watchdog/ Fourth branch of government/ 'fourth estate'
They key ideas of each are different but I don't think any of them are 'wrong' definitions. It is more they are different variations and purposes of investigative journalism.
Bruce Redman showed us some investigative journalist trailblazers who changed the world through the stories they uncovered and exposed. This was both inspiring and a little intimidating as there is so much work involved. I definitely feel that the story a journalist uncovers must have special meaning for them to be able to toil over it so long and meticulously. Some examples of local investigative journalism were: The Global Mail, Crikey and Australian Story
I think Bruce gave us three very important things to consider when undertaking an investigation:
Some types of investigative interaction:
-Interviews (both with on record and anonymous sources)
-Observations
-Documents (laws suits, legal docs, tax records)
-Briefings
-Leaks
-Trespass
-Theft
Possible threats to investigative journalism include:
- Intelligence - money sex and power often comes up in investigative journalism
- Informed - research and get the facts
- Intuitive - use your gut feeling
- Inside - get on the inside
- Invest - invest a lot of yourself
I found it interesting that there were four different definitions given for investigative journalism, all of which I agreed with. I have written them below.
Definition 1: Critical and thorough journalism
- Critical - The journalist is an active participant
- Thorough - the journalist makes substantial effort
- Active intervention - the key idea
Definition 2: Custodians of conscience
- Exposure - the key idea
- Takes societies morals and norms and holds breaches up to public scrutiny
Definition 3: Provide a voice for those without one and hold the powerful to account
- Social justice - giving power to the powerless, voice to the voiceless
- Public interest - the key idea
Defintion 4: Government watchdog/ Fourth branch of government/ 'fourth estate'
- Balancing the power of the government with the powerless of society
- Interrogating judiciary, executive and legislature to ensure free flow of information in our democracy
- Hold public figures accountable for functions that impact on society
- Watchdog - key idea
They key ideas of each are different but I don't think any of them are 'wrong' definitions. It is more they are different variations and purposes of investigative journalism.
Bruce Redman showed us some investigative journalist trailblazers who changed the world through the stories they uncovered and exposed. This was both inspiring and a little intimidating as there is so much work involved. I definitely feel that the story a journalist uncovers must have special meaning for them to be able to toil over it so long and meticulously. Some examples of local investigative journalism were: The Global Mail, Crikey and Australian Story
I think Bruce gave us three very important things to consider when undertaking an investigation:
- Always check your facts
- Assume nothing
- Expect whistle blowers to go crazy
Some types of investigative interaction:
-Interviews (both with on record and anonymous sources)
-Observations
-Documents (laws suits, legal docs, tax records)
-Briefings
-Leaks
-Trespass
-Theft
Possible threats to investigative journalism include:
- Online news - Less money, less journalists and less time
- Growth in PR - Shrinkage in journalism
Annotated Bibliography
Cline, A. (2009). Putting
Journalism's Unwritten Theory of Democracy onto Paper. Journal of
Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 24
(2-3), 194-196
Andrew Cline from the Department of
Media, Journalism and Film at Missouri State University reviews the
published works of Jeffrey Scheuer, The Big Picture: Why
Democracies Need Journalistic Excellence.
The author first discusses the unwritten theory of democracy using
information from Democracy and the News
by Herbert J. Gans (2003) to clarify his ideas. Cline is unimpressed
with Scheuer's approach to putting journalism's unwritten theory of
democracy into writing and uses direct quotes from Scheuer's book and
example scenarios to strengthen his argument. With citations once
again from Scheuer's book he points out that the author makes claims
without evidence, often fails to elaborate and uses unoriginal ideas
found in other published works. Throughout the review Cline also
contrasts and challenges Scheuer's book with citations from two other
published works on similar topics. In an effort to find positive
aspects of the book Cline asserts the book's value in creating
discussion in journalism ethics and suggests it as a prequel to
Kovach and Rosenstiel's (2001) Elements of Journalism.
The review given by Cline has evidence backing its opinions, and aims
to give an experienced perspective on an ethical issue of journalism.
Sunday Night.
Channel 7. 1 April 2012. Retrieved from
Sunday Night's
award-winning investigative journalist (Knox, 2008), Ross Coulthart,
examines why Matthew Barclay and two boys before him died at the
Australian Life Saving Championship. Coulthart interviews a variety
of sources to add credibility to his investigation including Phil and
Dana Bird - parents of deceased Saxon Bird, professional lifeguard -
Terry McDermott, CEO of Surf Life Saving - Brett Williamson and Super
Intendant - Jim Keogh. After various interviews, Coulthart confronts
Surf Life Saving Queensland President - Ralph Devlin, as to why the
event was allowed to run. One of the key arguments put forth by
Coulthart is documentary evidence of the competition's sponsorship
contracts. As these documents are never shown on the program viewers
must trust Coulthart to be telling the truth. Because Sunday Night
relies on audience numbers for its survival, it makes the
investigation emotionally and visually engaging. It emphasises
injustice and points fingers to create drama that captivates its
audience. Visual stimulation shows grieving people, funeral footage,
dangerous surf and unflattering close-ups of the accused Life Saving
President. These techniques are used to sway audience opinion to suit
Coulthart's agenda and keep them from flicking the remote.
Calligeros,
M. (2012 March 29). Heartbreak and Inquiries after death of
'great kid'. Retrieved from
Marissa Calligeros
is a University of Queensland graduate and finalist for Queensland's
Student Journalist of the Year 2008 who currently works for the
Brisbane Times (Marissa Calligeros, 2009). In this online article she
reports on the death of Matthew Barclay, the effect of this tragedy
on the community and the investigations that will take place in the
future. As Brisbane Times is a local news source, whose audience
resides in Brisbane city and its surrounds, the report focuses
strongly on the community effect of Matthew's death. Interviews of
his friends and classmates along with descriptions of those grieving
are peppered throughout the article. This is very different to the
less personal, more interrogative approach of Calthart. Calligeros
interviews several people to add credibility, but her opinion and
conclusion as to how Matthew died are not stated like in Calthart
investigation. When assessing the credibility of this online article
it must be remembered that the Brisbane Times, like Sunday Night, is
a commercial media driven by profit-making. The article's target
audience is more localised and the approach taken by the reporter is
not about 'finding who is to blame' like Sunday Night's Calthart, but
in exposing a local tragedy to the community.
Forbes,
T. & Eastley, T. (Presenters) (2012 March 29). Teenage
Life Savers body found. AM, ABC
Radio
According to ABC
News (2012) AM has been setting the day's agenda with concise reports
and analysis from journalists for over forty years. The ABC
corporation is a citizen-funded public media whose values are centred
around informing the public and producing quality material (Redman,
2012). As it has no allegiance to investors and is not driven by
profit-making it is a highly regarded news source in Australia. Radio
presenter Tony Eastley has been working at the ABC as a journalist,
foreign correspondent and television and radio presenter for over
thirty years (ABC News, 2012). On his radio show he discusses with
reporter Tom Forbes the aftermath of Matthew Barclay's death. Tom
Forbes reports directly from Kurrawa beach where the tragedy took
place. Throughout the discussion talk is focused mainly on the
conditions of the beach and the body found earlier that day. Forbes'
report of the incident has none of the drama of Calthart's
investigation and less personalisation compared to Calligeros's
report. True to ABC style, it brings a lot of facts and no personal
opinions, but these facts are hard to verify when listening because
of the lack of visual aid. We have to trust that Forbes has done his
research and interviewed people before talking on AM with Tony
Eastley as there are no direct quotes or interviews to back him.
Interestingly, both
the ABC Radio report and The Brisbane Times report leave the question
as to how Matthew died unanswered whereas Sunday Night's
investigation tries to convince its audience that Matthew died
because of dangerous surf conditions. While the other two sources
blame no one Sunday Night, after interviewing different people,
directly accuses Surf Life Saving Queensland for the fifteen-year-old's death. As no formal investigation has yet taken place and no
evidence of how Matthew died has been released these assumptions are
questionable. This highlights once again Sunday Night's commercial
media outlook, pulling audience numbers rather than keeping to the
facts.
APA Reference List
ABC News. (2012). AM with Tony Eastley. Retrieved from
Calligeros,
M. (2012 March 29). Heartbreak and Inquiries after death of
'great kid'. Retrieved from
Cline, A. (2009). Putting Journalism's Unwritten Theory of Democracy
onto Paper. Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of
Media Morality, 24 (2-3), 194-196
Forbes, T. & Eastley, T. (Presenters) (2012 March 29). Teenage
Life Savers body found. ABC Local Radio
Knox, D. (2008, October 17). Ross Coulthart Joins Seven.
Retrieved from:
Marissa Calligeros. (2009). Brisbane Times. Retrieved from
Redman, B. (2012) Week 7 – Public Media. [PowerPoint
slides]. Unpublished manuscript. JOUR1111. University of Queensland,
Queensland, Australia
Thursday, 17 May 2012
Sir David Attenborough: A Man to be Admired
Of all the people in the world, Sir David Attenborough would have to be one that I admire and look up to most. Not only is he an example of someone who has crossed zoology and journalism to form one of the best jobs in the world, but he is a man of great integrity and honesty. For over five decades he has appeared on our tv, introducing us to some astonishing features of the natural world and giving audiences an appreciation for the world around us. Some of his most significant works include:
I'd also like to put up Sir David Attenborough's interview with Andrew Denton, who I believe is one of the best interviewers around.
- Life on Earth (1979)
- The Living Planet (1984)
- The Trials of Life (1990)
- The Private Life of Plants (1995)
- The Life of Birds (1998)
- The Life of Mammals (2002)
- Life in the Undergrowth (2005)
I'd also like to put up Sir David Attenborough's interview with Andrew Denton, who I believe is one of the best interviewers around.
Monday, 14 May 2012
Week 11 - Agenda Setting
When we flick on the TV and watch the news how many people stop and think, why this story? Why this point of view? In today's lecture Bruce talked about Agenda Setting, or how the media constructs reality. There are four main types of agenda:
1. Public Agenda
2. Policy Agenda
3. Corporate Agenda
4. Media Agenda
Who sets the agenda? Is what we see in the media reality or propaganda? It is usually somewhere in between. The mass media gives us a perception of reality, a filter and reshaping of it to set whatever agenda suits them. And why do they do this? Because they can! The mass media has the power to create pictures in our heads. When setting an agenda twp principle rules are followed:
1. What the public should focus on through coverage
2. How people should think about the issue
When hearing about the media's manipulation of reality to suit their own agendas we start to question what, if anything, we can trust to be true. Is anything we read just the plain and simple truth? A man name Lippmann said that people rely on the images in their minds in formulating judgements rather than by critically thinking. I think this is very good advice. We also learned about the Agenda Setting Family, summarized below:
The Agenda Setting Family
Media Gate-keeping - What the media chooses to show the public, the exposure of an issue
Media Advocacy - The purposeful promotion of a message
Agenda cutting - Most of the realities going on the in the world aren't represented,
Agenda surfing - The media follows the crowd and trends, the media surfs on the wave of topics originally mentioned in the leading media
Diffusion of News - The process through which and important event is communicated to the public
Portrayal of an Issue - How an issue is portrayed will often influence how it is perceived by the public
Media Dependence - The more dependent a person is on the media the more susceptible they are to media agenda setting
Some of the obvious weaknesses of agenda setting are: people are not well informed, are often ignorant of the details, news cannot create and conceal problems it can only alter awareness and priority
Finally, are there any strengths in agenda setting? The answer, yes: agenda setting explains why people prioritize certain issues, it gives some predictive power, organizes existing knowledge of media effects, it lays groundwork for further research and can potentially be proven false.
I think there are both good and bad aspects to agenda setting but whether we like it or not it is there, and probably always will be. People will always influence others where they can, the key is to be aware of it!
1. Public Agenda
2. Policy Agenda
3. Corporate Agenda
4. Media Agenda
Who sets the agenda? Is what we see in the media reality or propaganda? It is usually somewhere in between. The mass media gives us a perception of reality, a filter and reshaping of it to set whatever agenda suits them. And why do they do this? Because they can! The mass media has the power to create pictures in our heads. When setting an agenda twp principle rules are followed:
1. What the public should focus on through coverage
2. How people should think about the issue
When hearing about the media's manipulation of reality to suit their own agendas we start to question what, if anything, we can trust to be true. Is anything we read just the plain and simple truth? A man name Lippmann said that people rely on the images in their minds in formulating judgements rather than by critically thinking. I think this is very good advice. We also learned about the Agenda Setting Family, summarized below:
The Agenda Setting Family
Media Gate-keeping - What the media chooses to show the public, the exposure of an issue
Media Advocacy - The purposeful promotion of a message
Agenda cutting - Most of the realities going on the in the world aren't represented,
Agenda surfing - The media follows the crowd and trends, the media surfs on the wave of topics originally mentioned in the leading media
Diffusion of News - The process through which and important event is communicated to the public
Portrayal of an Issue - How an issue is portrayed will often influence how it is perceived by the public
Media Dependence - The more dependent a person is on the media the more susceptible they are to media agenda setting
Some of the obvious weaknesses of agenda setting are: people are not well informed, are often ignorant of the details, news cannot create and conceal problems it can only alter awareness and priority
Finally, are there any strengths in agenda setting? The answer, yes: agenda setting explains why people prioritize certain issues, it gives some predictive power, organizes existing knowledge of media effects, it lays groundwork for further research and can potentially be proven false.
I think there are both good and bad aspects to agenda setting but whether we like it or not it is there, and probably always will be. People will always influence others where they can, the key is to be aware of it!
Sunday, 13 May 2012
Its Mother's Day
Just wanted to say a big HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY to all the mum's out there! Today is the day to show your mum how much she is appreciated and loved. Its also a time of year I reflect on how lucky I am to still have my mum. Around this time five years ago my mother was diagnosed with breast cancer and I didn't know if she would live to see another mother's day. Luckily for me she overcame the cancer but today on the news I discovered every year 13,000 women in Australia do not. Breast cancer is the now the most common women's cancer out there.
Today the annual Mother's Day Classic was held around Australia, a fun run to raise money for breast cancer. I was amazed to discover that $4 million has been raised for research and thousands gave up their mother's day to complete the run. Congratulations to all those who participated and helped make such a staggering figure of money. If you'd like to visit the website here is the link: http://mothersdayclassic.com.au/news/celebrate-15-years-15-million
Today the annual Mother's Day Classic was held around Australia, a fun run to raise money for breast cancer. I was amazed to discover that $4 million has been raised for research and thousands gave up their mother's day to complete the run. Congratulations to all those who participated and helped make such a staggering figure of money. If you'd like to visit the website here is the link: http://mothersdayclassic.com.au/news/celebrate-15-years-15-million
Wednesday, 9 May 2012
How bad are artificial sweeteners?
Growing up as a child there were always two things my mum never let me have: chewing gum and coke. I used to get so excited when I went to a friend's party and we could drink coke. Or when my dad would secretly offer me some gum in the car and say not to tell mum. The reason my mum gave me when I asked why I wasn't allowed them was, 'they are bad foods because they are so full of sugar. You already get enough sugar without eating them.'
As I became a teenager I was able to make my own choices about what to eat and of course I indulged in soft drink, often coke, when out with friends. When I got my driving license I made a habit of buying gum to keep in the car and chew when I drove. My compromise for going against my mum's teachings and staying healthy? I always bought coke zero and sugar-free gum.
Over the years I have heard various stories about the 'crap' put in diet coke and coke zero. 'Diet coke gives you cancer' is a common one. Now as a young adult I don't drink much coke, maybe a 450ml bottle once a month, and I don't chew gum at all. But today just so happened to be one of the rare days I splashed out and bought a coke zero for myself while traveling home from uni. While drinking it I took a look at the label and the ingredients, here they are:
The main sweeteners are Aspartame and Acesulphame-K. I decided to do a little more research to discover if these two sweeteners really deserve their bad reputation, and whether I want drink this stuff.
The first website I visited was: http://www.thezeromovement.org and they gave an interesting description of the ingredients:
This website certainly damns just about everything in a bottle of coke. After googling sweeteners 950 and 951 I found this website http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/education/DLiT/2006/food%20additives/theyare/avoid.htm which I deemed to be a little more reliable as it an education website. The website claims the following side effects from sweeteners 950 and 951:
Cancer, asthma, MS-like symptoms, headache, hyperactivity, fatigue, anxiety, dizziness, migraine, memory loss, depression, insomnia, irritability, impotence, epilepsy, blindness, diabetes, neuralgia, seizures, brain damage, gastrointestinal upsets
These two websites certainly make a strong case for the dangers involved in consuming the sweeteners in diet coke and coke zero. Though I would have to look at a wider range of sources before finally deciding whether or not to give up sugar-free coke, what I have seen so far worries me. It has certainly spurred me on to become more aware of what's in food and drinks.
As I became a teenager I was able to make my own choices about what to eat and of course I indulged in soft drink, often coke, when out with friends. When I got my driving license I made a habit of buying gum to keep in the car and chew when I drove. My compromise for going against my mum's teachings and staying healthy? I always bought coke zero and sugar-free gum.
Over the years I have heard various stories about the 'crap' put in diet coke and coke zero. 'Diet coke gives you cancer' is a common one. Now as a young adult I don't drink much coke, maybe a 450ml bottle once a month, and I don't chew gum at all. But today just so happened to be one of the rare days I splashed out and bought a coke zero for myself while traveling home from uni. While drinking it I took a look at the label and the ingredients, here they are:
The main sweeteners are Aspartame and Acesulphame-K. I decided to do a little more research to discover if these two sweeteners really deserve their bad reputation, and whether I want drink this stuff.
The first website I visited was: http://www.thezeromovement.org and they gave an interesting description of the ingredients:
The ingredients (as written in bold) are listed on Australian cans of Coke Zero. Water anyone?
Carbonated water
Colour (150d) - aka "Sulphite Ammonia Caramel"
Food acid 338 - aka "Phosphoric Acid" (Also used for rust removal!)
Food acid 331 - aka "Sodium Citrates" (Also used in photography and as an anticoagulant of blood stored for transfusion!)
Flavour
Sweetener 951 - aka "Asapartame" (According to the US FDA, "the [National Cancer Institute] currently is studying aspartame and other dietary factors as part of a larger study of adult brain cancer." You might want to wait for the results before you drink it. Also, avoid this one if you're moody!)
Sweetener 950 - aka "Acesulfame Potassium" (Looking for reasons to avoid this sweetener? Look no further...)
Preservative 211 - aka "Sodium Benzoate" (Undiluted this stuff isn't too bad... Just don't let it touch your skin!)
Caffeine
This website certainly damns just about everything in a bottle of coke. After googling sweeteners 950 and 951 I found this website http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/education/DLiT/2006/food%20additives/theyare/avoid.htm which I deemed to be a little more reliable as it an education website. The website claims the following side effects from sweeteners 950 and 951:
Cancer, asthma, MS-like symptoms, headache, hyperactivity, fatigue, anxiety, dizziness, migraine, memory loss, depression, insomnia, irritability, impotence, epilepsy, blindness, diabetes, neuralgia, seizures, brain damage, gastrointestinal upsets
These two websites certainly make a strong case for the dangers involved in consuming the sweeteners in diet coke and coke zero. Though I would have to look at a wider range of sources before finally deciding whether or not to give up sugar-free coke, what I have seen so far worries me. It has certainly spurred me on to become more aware of what's in food and drinks.
Monday, 7 May 2012
My Top Ten Books
Today I thought I would post my favourite ten books. I have been devouring books ever since I could read and I still have a fantasy of one day writing a bestselling novel. For now I am writing short stories and learning about different styles of writing in my Arts degree. Without further ado here are my top ten recommendations, not in any particular order as was hard enough narrowing it down to ten.
This book came highly recommended to me by a friend who loved classics. The story is a historic romance set during the American Civil War. It follows the life of the young and beautiful Scarlett O'Hara and the scandalous but irresistible Rett Butler. What I loved so much was the way Mitchell combined an epic romance with the hardships and reality of the American Civil War. It's not the soppy romance we see so often today but a love-hate relationship between two people struggling to survive in a changed world.
This series had to be in my top ten because it combines one of the most detailed pieces of historical research with a fascinating fictional storyline. The series follows the life of Ayla, a young woman living 30,000 years ago in the Upper Paleolithic era. An orphan raised by Neanderthals, Ayla eventually embarks on a journey of self-discovery and survival that leads her back to her own people. Auel takes us back to our roots and creates a possible reality of how our ancestors might have lived and evolved.
The Millennium Trilogy has to be the best crime/thriller series out there. Based in Sweden the trilogy's protagonists are the unique punk chick Lisbeth Sander and journalist Mikael Blomkvist. The series has strong underlying theme of abuse and violence against women and with such an original character found in Lisbeth Salander I could not put it down. Even if you don't usually read crime novels I urge you to try reading this series.
Anyone who hasn't heard of the Harry Potter series by now must lead the life of the caveman. I think almost everyone knows of Harry Potter, the boy who lived, and his struggle against the most powerful dark wizard to have ever existed, Lord Voldemort. The first book in the series was given to me as a ninth birthday present and I have been hooked ever since. Yes, I was one of the people who went and got the book the first day it was released and then stayed up all day and all night reading it. Perhaps the most famous series of our time, even if you've seen the movies, its definitely a must to read.
Without a doubt the best epic-fantasy book I have read and probably will ever read, The Lord Of The Rings is a masterpiece of writing. English philologist J.R.R Tolkien thrusts his readers into the world of Middle Earth where the Dark Lord Sauron is seeking his Ring of Power. The fate of the land coincidentally comes into the hands of a young hobbit named Frodo Baggins who must destroy the ring. The characters in Lord Of The Rings stayed with me long after I had turned the last page and though it is not the sort of book one can 'devour' in a few sittings it's so rich in detail, ideas and symbolism its impossible to leave.
Tammie Matson is the sort of zoologist I aspire to be and so her biography of her experiences in Africa were an unforgettable and moving read for me. Tammie took her first trip to Africa with her father at the age of fifteen and immediately fell head-over-heels in love with the continent. Her biography is funny, moving, fascinating and insightful and because of my love for Africa and its wildlife I couldn't stop reading it. If you're not an aspiring zoologist or wildlife lover it may not be your cup of tea but it made quite an impact on my life.
Whether you're an aspiring writer or just someone who likes biographies this is a fantastic read. Stephen King is one of the best known American novelists around, having spouted out dozens of bestselling novels. In his memoir On Writing, King deals out writing advice as well as some highly amusing and also personal memories. It certainly helped inspire me with my writing.
I read this book in Year 11 English and at first I was not particularly impressed by it. It was not until we discussed it in class and I got some background to the story that I began to appreciate what a phenomenal piece of writing it is. To Kill a Mockingbird is seen through the eyes of Scout, a young girl growing up during the Great Depression. Its main theme is centralized around racial injustice and it shocked me as a sixteen year old to read of how American Negroes were treated. It is a work that reveals America's dark past, its class divisions, racial divisions and struggle through a time of great hardship.
Bryce Courtenay is an African born white man and his novel The Power of One is based on many of his experiences growing up during the Apartheid. Though not a biography many of the scenes written in the book are inspired by Courtney's own life experiences. I found the Power of One an uplifting read and an insight into the African Apartheid which I had known very little of.
1. Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
This book came highly recommended to me by a friend who loved classics. The story is a historic romance set during the American Civil War. It follows the life of the young and beautiful Scarlett O'Hara and the scandalous but irresistible Rett Butler. What I loved so much was the way Mitchell combined an epic romance with the hardships and reality of the American Civil War. It's not the soppy romance we see so often today but a love-hate relationship between two people struggling to survive in a changed world.
2. Earth's Children by Jean M. Auel
This series had to be in my top ten because it combines one of the most detailed pieces of historical research with a fascinating fictional storyline. The series follows the life of Ayla, a young woman living 30,000 years ago in the Upper Paleolithic era. An orphan raised by Neanderthals, Ayla eventually embarks on a journey of self-discovery and survival that leads her back to her own people. Auel takes us back to our roots and creates a possible reality of how our ancestors might have lived and evolved.
3. Millennium Trilogy By Stieg Larsson
4. Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling
Anyone who hasn't heard of the Harry Potter series by now must lead the life of the caveman. I think almost everyone knows of Harry Potter, the boy who lived, and his struggle against the most powerful dark wizard to have ever existed, Lord Voldemort. The first book in the series was given to me as a ninth birthday present and I have been hooked ever since. Yes, I was one of the people who went and got the book the first day it was released and then stayed up all day and all night reading it. Perhaps the most famous series of our time, even if you've seen the movies, its definitely a must to read.
5. The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R Tolkien
Without a doubt the best epic-fantasy book I have read and probably will ever read, The Lord Of The Rings is a masterpiece of writing. English philologist J.R.R Tolkien thrusts his readers into the world of Middle Earth where the Dark Lord Sauron is seeking his Ring of Power. The fate of the land coincidentally comes into the hands of a young hobbit named Frodo Baggins who must destroy the ring. The characters in Lord Of The Rings stayed with me long after I had turned the last page and though it is not the sort of book one can 'devour' in a few sittings it's so rich in detail, ideas and symbolism its impossible to leave.
6. Dry Water by Tammie Matson
Tammie Matson is the sort of zoologist I aspire to be and so her biography of her experiences in Africa were an unforgettable and moving read for me. Tammie took her first trip to Africa with her father at the age of fifteen and immediately fell head-over-heels in love with the continent. Her biography is funny, moving, fascinating and insightful and because of my love for Africa and its wildlife I couldn't stop reading it. If you're not an aspiring zoologist or wildlife lover it may not be your cup of tea but it made quite an impact on my life.
7. Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen
I actually saw the movie Pride and Prejudice, starring Kiera Knightly and Matthew Macfadyen, before I read the book. Being a fan of historical costume dramas I loved the movie so much I decided to give the book a try. I had heard from some people that it was a difficult read because it was written at the beginning of the 18th century. I did not find this the case. Perhaps because I already knew much of plot I found it, not a quick read, but not hard. I love this classic romance and particularly the strong-headed character of Elizabeth Bennett.
8. On Writing by Steven King
Whether you're an aspiring writer or just someone who likes biographies this is a fantastic read. Stephen King is one of the best known American novelists around, having spouted out dozens of bestselling novels. In his memoir On Writing, King deals out writing advice as well as some highly amusing and also personal memories. It certainly helped inspire me with my writing.
9. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee
I read this book in Year 11 English and at first I was not particularly impressed by it. It was not until we discussed it in class and I got some background to the story that I began to appreciate what a phenomenal piece of writing it is. To Kill a Mockingbird is seen through the eyes of Scout, a young girl growing up during the Great Depression. Its main theme is centralized around racial injustice and it shocked me as a sixteen year old to read of how American Negroes were treated. It is a work that reveals America's dark past, its class divisions, racial divisions and struggle through a time of great hardship.
10. The Power of One by Bryce Courtenay
Bryce Courtenay is an African born white man and his novel The Power of One is based on many of his experiences growing up during the Apartheid. Though not a biography many of the scenes written in the book are inspired by Courtney's own life experiences. I found the Power of One an uplifting read and an insight into the African Apartheid which I had known very little of.
Friday, 4 May 2012
The Dictator Tackles Today
As you may or may not know Sacha Baron Cohen arrived in Australia a few days ago. This time he has come in the guise of Admiral General Aladeen to promote his upcoming movie, The Dictator. Already he has created a stir with comments involving Julia Gillard and a sex change, 'Slippery slipper." and even calling the female presenter on the Today show 'sugar tits'. I watched his interview on the Today show and once again he does enough crude jokes to make me both offended and in stitches at the same time. He is certainly an entertainer. The interview is below for those who wish to watch it.
Now I am happy to admit that I have seen two of Sacha Baron Cohen's previous movies, both Borat and Bruno, and perhaps a little guiltily I will admit I found them both highly entertaining. Though the humour is often crude and the scenes can sometimes leave you going, "what the?!" he is undoubtedly one funny guy. For those who don't like him, all I can advise is that he is a comedian. Its his job to pay out anyone and everyone so go with it rather than get offended.
His latest movie The Dictator will be in cinemas on May 15 and tells 'the story of a dictator who risked his life to ensure that democracy would never come to the country he so lovingly oppressed' (Wikipedia 2012)
Monday, 30 April 2012
Lecture 9 - News Values
What makes a headline in the news? Why are some stories given more attention than others and seen to be more important news? "If it bleeds it leads" is a quote heard many times to describe common top news stories. What makes people so interested in these stories of war, murder and tragedy? In our week nine lecture we discovered the values of news stories that make a big splash as opposed to a tiny ripple. News values as defined by Wikipedia is 'how much prominence a news story is given by a media outlet, and the attention it is given by the audience'.
News Values:
1. Impact - shock or 'wow' factor
2. Audience identification - interests people
3. Pragmatics - Ethics, practicality, current affairs
4. Source Influence - PR (press release)
These four values seem a good starting point for deciding what story to place at the beginning of TV news or a newspaper. If we look at the headline news for today of the Brisbane Times the two major stories I found were:
Graham Quirk as the new Brisbane mayor hasn't the 'wow' factor compared to the first story but it is certainly of great importance to the people of Brisbane and a recent affair.
News values have changed and varied over time and were not always those ones shown above. In the lecture we looked at several people's theories as to what makes a story newsworthy. Galtung and Ruge were among the first to come up with a set of values to explain what made headlines. Below are their twelve suggested values.
O'Neill and Harcup have narrowed Galtung and Ruge's intial newsworthiness ideas down to ten suggestions.
Though the 'newsworthiness' of a story has clearly changed over time and even varies from person to person I think we can see some key similarities between them all. Values appear to change rungs on the list rather than appear and disappear entirely. On one of that last lecture slides it was written, 'what do you think is newsworthy?' In my opinion O'Neill and Harcup's version of newsworthiness is the best model and it should be noted that this also is the most modern model I have posted and so relates best to today's news media.
Here is my list in descending order of what I think the news values of today are:
News Values:
1. Impact - shock or 'wow' factor
2. Audience identification - interests people
3. Pragmatics - Ethics, practicality, current affairs
4. Source Influence - PR (press release)
These four values seem a good starting point for deciding what story to place at the beginning of TV news or a newspaper. If we look at the headline news for today of the Brisbane Times the two major stories I found were:
- The ongoing investigation into the murder of Brisbane mother-of-three Allison Baden-Clay
- The win of Graham Quirk for Brisbane mayor in last weekend's election
Graham Quirk as the new Brisbane mayor hasn't the 'wow' factor compared to the first story but it is certainly of great importance to the people of Brisbane and a recent affair.
News values have changed and varied over time and were not always those ones shown above. In the lecture we looked at several people's theories as to what makes a story newsworthy. Galtung and Ruge were among the first to come up with a set of values to explain what made headlines. Below are their twelve suggested values.
Galtung and Ruge's three hypothesis:
Additivity Hypothesis - The more factors an event satisfies the higher probability it becomes news
Complementarity Hypothesis - The factors will tend to exclude each other
Exclusion Hypothesis - Events that satsify few or none of the factors will not become news
Golding and Elliot added their thoughts in 1979 with some interesting additions:
- Drama
- Visual attractiveness
- Entertainment
- Importance
- Size
- Proximity
- Negativity
- Brevity
- Recency
- Elites
- Personalities
O'Neill and Harcup have narrowed Galtung and Ruge's intial newsworthiness ideas down to ten suggestions.
Though the 'newsworthiness' of a story has clearly changed over time and even varies from person to person I think we can see some key similarities between them all. Values appear to change rungs on the list rather than appear and disappear entirely. On one of that last lecture slides it was written, 'what do you think is newsworthy?' In my opinion O'Neill and Harcup's version of newsworthiness is the best model and it should be noted that this also is the most modern model I have posted and so relates best to today's news media.
Here is my list in descending order of what I think the news values of today are:
- Impact/ Magnitude - Who and how many people it effects
- Importance - Stories that are relevant to the audience
- Proximity - How close it is to the audience
- Recency - How recent the story is
- The Elite - Concerning the powerful, influential
- Surprise - A stories shock value
- Entertainment - How much it entertains
- Celebrity - Stories about the famour
- Negativity - Conflict and tragedy
- Good News - Positive overtones that make the audience feel good
Thursday, 26 April 2012
Factual Storytelling: A Change Of Country, A Change Of Life
A Change Of Country, A Change Of Life
I've now been back at home longer than
I was away. For the most part I've been very happy ever since
returning to Australia and I haven't devoted much thought or time to
remembering my five months in India. But looking back on photos I
start to miss my Indian home: the people, the places, the food, the
adventure. India was by no means an easy place to live, how could it
be with over a billion people crammed in like sardines? But it was
the story of a lifetime.
I signed up to Lattitude Global
Volunteering halfway through Year 12 when exams had my nerves
stretched to breaking point. Sitting at my computer day after day I
would dream about the adventure that awaited me if I just got myself
through my final year of school.
It seemed to take forever, but
eventually the day dawned when it was time to leave. My mum and dad
kissed me goodbye and before I knew it I was on my own, heading off
to one of the poorest, craziest countries in the world. I began to
wonder what I'd let myself in for.
When people ask me, “how was India?”
I find it very difficult to answer. Everything that could be said
about India, the opposite is also true. My trip was both wonderful,
and horrible. There were times I laughed so hard I couldn't breathe
and there were times I wanted to curl up in a ball and know it was
over. It is a country of contrasts. You can walk down the street and
see a man as fat as a walrus walking past a man whose body is wasting
away to nothing.
I taught English at a middle class
school called Olympus High. Every afternoon I would also go and help
out at a slum school a few kilometres down the road and these kids
had nothing but the borrowed uniforms on their back. In contrast to
the kids at Olympus they were skinnier, less confident, and their
school books were carried in plastic bags. But their enthusiasm to
learn was unparalleled. Though their English was much poorer they
were the best students I have seen in any school anywhere in the
world. I taught them songs, showed them videos of Australia and its
wildlife and every afternoon as I left the little room where I taught
them I felt a warmth inside me and a sense of pride for what I was
doing. To know that I was helping these kids get an education and
make something of themselves was an indescribable feeling. Its the
most rewarding thing I've ever done.
As the months rolled by I grew to love
and hate India almost equally. The pollution was almost unbearable.
It clung to my skin, made my eyes yellow, my snot black and my hair
fall out. Hygiene was basic and I found the reactions of my friends
and family back home funny when I told them I used squat toilets and
washed out of a bucket of cold water. There was no water for washing
hands, mosquitoes woke me up almost every night, and sometimes it was
even too hot to sleep. It was these times I knew I was a long way
from home, but I always felt grateful for the experience. To
experience life in a much less privileged place, where people never
complained about their situation left me feeling quite humbled.
I slept in a dormitory with twelve of
the boarding children at Olympus High. We woke at six o'clock every
morning (except Sundays), got ready for school, had a breakfast of
chai and rusk (a sort of bread), attended/taught classes, ate lunch,
and finished school for the day. After school the children had sports
activities and they spent their evenings studying, only stopping for
dinner. The dedication the Indian children showed to their school
work would put Aussie kids to shame. Eight and nine year olds spent
four to five hours a day doing after-school work. I truly came to
love these kids and the staff who ran the dormitory. They are the
best of India and what I miss the most.
I can remember wanting to cry when I
saw the yellow sands of Australia from my seat on the plane. My
country was so pristine and clean. Driving home was surreal. There
were no people walking beside the road, no three-wheeled rickshaws or
constant beeping horns, no rubbish, and no crazy drivers. The moon
was white, not the hazy yellow I had become accustomed to seeing
through the smog. I now know how lucky I am to live where I do.
I wish everyone could have as
eye-opening experience as I did. It changed my perspective on life
forever and gave me an appreciation I never had before. I grew up in
India; I left still a child and came back an adult. In India I
discovered how strong I really am, what I am capable of and what the
world has to offer. Looking back at photos of my time there, it was
the most rewarding thing I've ever done and it has helped make me who
I am today.
Monday, 23 April 2012
MEAA Code of Ethics
After the Ethics Lecture I was interested to find out more about Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance Code of Ethics. I visited their website: http://www.alliance.org.au/code-of-ethics.html
Below is the Media Alliance Code of Ethics. I think it is very important that all journalists read this as we will be confronted with many ethical issues in our jobs. There are far too many breaches of ethics in advertising, entertainment and storytelling and by reading this we may avoid falling into some of them.
NOTE: The following is pasted directly from the website mentioned above.
Respect
for truth and the public's right to information are fundamental
principles of journalism. Journalists describe society to itself. They
convey information, ideas and opinions, a privileged role. They search,
disclose, record, question, entertain, suggest and remember. They inform
citizens and animate democracy. They give a practical form to freedom
of expression. Many journalists work in private enterprise, but all have
these public responsibilities. They scrutinise power, but also exercise
it, and should be accountable. Accountability engenders trust. Without
trust, journalists do not fulfil their public responsibilities. Alliance
members engaged in journalism commit themselves to
2. Do not place unnecessary emphasis on personal characteristics, including race, ethnicity, nationality, gender, age, sexual orientation, family relationships, religious belief, or physical or intellectual disability.
3. Aim to attribute information to its source. Where a source seeks anonymity, do not agree without first considering the source's motives and any alternative attributable source. Where confidences are accepted, respect them in all circumstances.
4. Do not allow personal interest, or any belief, commitment, payment, gift or benefit, to undermine your accuracy, fairness or independence.
5. Disclose conflicts of interest that affect, or could be seen to affect, the accuracy, fairness or independence of your journalism. Do not improperly use a journalistic position for personal gain.
6. Do not allow advertising or other commercial considerations to undermine accuracy, fairness or independence.
7. Do your utmost to ensure disclosure of any direct or indirect payment made for interviews, pictures, information or stories.
8. Use fair, responsible and honest means to obtain material. Identify yourself and your employer before obtaining any interview for publication or broadcast. Never exploit a person's vulnerability or ignorance of media practice.
9. Present pictures and sound which are true and accurate. Any manipulation likely to mislead should be disclosed.
10. Do not plagiarise.
11. Respect private grief and personal privacy. Journalists have the right to resist compulsion to intrude.
12. Do your utmost to achieve fair correction of errors.
Guidance Clause
Basic values often need interpretation and sometimes come into conflict. Ethical journalism requires conscientious decision-making in context. Only substantial advancement of the public interest or risk of substantial harm to people allows any standard to be overridden.
Below is the Media Alliance Code of Ethics. I think it is very important that all journalists read this as we will be confronted with many ethical issues in our jobs. There are far too many breaches of ethics in advertising, entertainment and storytelling and by reading this we may avoid falling into some of them.
NOTE: The following is pasted directly from the website mentioned above.
Media Alliance Code of Ethics
Honesty1. Report and interpret honestly, striving for accuracy, fairness and disclosure of all essential facts. Do not suppress relevant available facts, or give distorting emphasis. Do your utmost to give a fair opportunity for reply.
Fairness
Independence
Respect for the rights of others
2. Do not place unnecessary emphasis on personal characteristics, including race, ethnicity, nationality, gender, age, sexual orientation, family relationships, religious belief, or physical or intellectual disability.
3. Aim to attribute information to its source. Where a source seeks anonymity, do not agree without first considering the source's motives and any alternative attributable source. Where confidences are accepted, respect them in all circumstances.
4. Do not allow personal interest, or any belief, commitment, payment, gift or benefit, to undermine your accuracy, fairness or independence.
5. Disclose conflicts of interest that affect, or could be seen to affect, the accuracy, fairness or independence of your journalism. Do not improperly use a journalistic position for personal gain.
6. Do not allow advertising or other commercial considerations to undermine accuracy, fairness or independence.
7. Do your utmost to ensure disclosure of any direct or indirect payment made for interviews, pictures, information or stories.
8. Use fair, responsible and honest means to obtain material. Identify yourself and your employer before obtaining any interview for publication or broadcast. Never exploit a person's vulnerability or ignorance of media practice.
9. Present pictures and sound which are true and accurate. Any manipulation likely to mislead should be disclosed.
10. Do not plagiarise.
11. Respect private grief and personal privacy. Journalists have the right to resist compulsion to intrude.
12. Do your utmost to achieve fair correction of errors.
Guidance Clause
Basic values often need interpretation and sometimes come into conflict. Ethical journalism requires conscientious decision-making in context. Only substantial advancement of the public interest or risk of substantial harm to people allows any standard to be overridden.
Lecture 8 - Ethics
Ethics was the topic for this week's lecture and was taken by guest speaker John Harrison. I found this week's lecture particularly fun as it was interactive and involved looking at a lot of different advertisements, both pictures and videos. We were asked to decide on each advertisement whether we thought it was ethical or unethical and whether it was tasteful or tacky. Here were my opinions:
Outdoor 1 - Tasteful, Ethical
Outdoor 2 - Tacky, Unethical - Gender stereotyping
Outdoor 3 - Tacky, Ethical
Outdoor 4 - Tasteful, Ethical
Outdoor 5 - Tacky, Unethical - Not about shoes, very sexual
TV 1 - Tasteful, Ethical - Word 'bloody' made it banned in UK
TV 2 - Tasteful, Ethical
TV 3 - Tacky, Ethical - Banned in NZ because of the word 'bugger'
TV 4 - Tacky, Unethical - Racial stereotypes
TV 5 - Tasteful, Ethical
Overall I would say the advertisement that I had the most problem with was actually TV 4. The comments made by Sam Kekovich stereotyped Australian's in a very offensive way and I find the advertisement both tacky and unethical. Get out of Australia if you're a vegetarian hippy? I am not a vegetarian or hippy but I found those words in particular very unethical.
John Harrison talked about what makes something good or bad? When and how is that decided? There are three ethical theories.
1. Deontology
Judges the morality of an action based on the action's adherence to a rule or rules
2. Consequentialism
Doesn't matter what you do as long as the outcome is 'right'
The end may justify the means
The greatest good for the greatest number
I personally could not agree with this second theory as I believe the way something is done matters a lot. The end does not always justify the means nor is the greatest good for the greatest number make something right. The last theory is the one I agree most with as does John Harrison.
3. Virtue - HIS CHOICE
'Goodness' comes from good habits of character
These habits are virtues eg, courage, justice, temperance, prudence
These are the 'golden means' of behaviour
By using virtues to decide if something is right or wrong I believe we get closest to an outcome that is both ethical and achieved in a good manner. It relies on individual's character to know what is right and wrong, not a set of rules put down. If journalist's and the media use courage, justice, temperance prudence in their judgement the content is most likely to be ethical. Of course the only problem with this is that individual's will have their own opinion as to what 'justice' and other virtues might be but on the whole I thin this is the best of the three theories.
Outdoor 1 - Tasteful, Ethical
Outdoor 2 - Tacky, Unethical - Gender stereotyping
Outdoor 3 - Tacky, Ethical
Outdoor 4 - Tasteful, Ethical
Outdoor 5 - Tacky, Unethical - Not about shoes, very sexual
TV 1 - Tasteful, Ethical - Word 'bloody' made it banned in UK
TV 2 - Tasteful, Ethical
TV 3 - Tacky, Ethical - Banned in NZ because of the word 'bugger'
TV 4 - Tacky, Unethical - Racial stereotypes
TV 5 - Tasteful, Ethical
Overall I would say the advertisement that I had the most problem with was actually TV 4. The comments made by Sam Kekovich stereotyped Australian's in a very offensive way and I find the advertisement both tacky and unethical. Get out of Australia if you're a vegetarian hippy? I am not a vegetarian or hippy but I found those words in particular very unethical.
John Harrison talked about what makes something good or bad? When and how is that decided? There are three ethical theories.
1. Deontology
Judges the morality of an action based on the action's adherence to a rule or rules
2. Consequentialism
Doesn't matter what you do as long as the outcome is 'right'
The end may justify the means
The greatest good for the greatest number
I personally could not agree with this second theory as I believe the way something is done matters a lot. The end does not always justify the means nor is the greatest good for the greatest number make something right. The last theory is the one I agree most with as does John Harrison.
3. Virtue - HIS CHOICE
'Goodness' comes from good habits of character
These habits are virtues eg, courage, justice, temperance, prudence
These are the 'golden means' of behaviour
By using virtues to decide if something is right or wrong I believe we get closest to an outcome that is both ethical and achieved in a good manner. It relies on individual's character to know what is right and wrong, not a set of rules put down. If journalist's and the media use courage, justice, temperance prudence in their judgement the content is most likely to be ethical. Of course the only problem with this is that individual's will have their own opinion as to what 'justice' and other virtues might be but on the whole I thin this is the best of the three theories.
Thursday, 19 April 2012
Kony 2012 - Cover The Night
The attention on the Kony 2012 campaign has dropped considerably since its release on 5th March. There has been very little said about it for a while now, even the release of its second video barely made a headline. Tonight though, is the date that has been set by the group Invisible Children to raise as much awareness of their campaign as possible. This time not via the internet, but physically in the form of putting up posters and signs everywhere of 'Kony 2012'.
Will they carry it off? I will be very interested to find out tomorrow morning. I wonder just how many people were convinced to buy the awareness packages they promoted on their two video releases. When I watched the first video I was definitely moved and right on board with them to catch Joseph Kony, but something held me back from going that bit further and purchasing the packages. Was I one of few or one of many?
Today I also watched the second video (above in case you haven't yet!) made by the Invisible Children in which they emphasized a little more on the actual whereabouts of Joseph Kony (which was a criticism from their first video) and what changes were beginning to take place. The big question is of course, are we actually any closer to catching Joseph Kony after all this 'awareness'? In my opinion, not really. Barack Obama may have signed some papers, perhaps more men are being assigned to hunt down the LRA but this guy is still out there, still free. He has apparently kidnapped over fifty more people since the first video. The second video was good though, addressing some of the criticisms put upon the first one and going into more detail, showing facts, people and plans.
As a journalism student I have found this whole campaign interesting to watch as it unfolds. As has been said before, something of this magnitude has never been done before, using digital media to reach so many people around the world and receiving such a strong response. I wish the Invisible Children all the best with their busy night ahead!!
Will they carry it off? I will be very interested to find out tomorrow morning. I wonder just how many people were convinced to buy the awareness packages they promoted on their two video releases. When I watched the first video I was definitely moved and right on board with them to catch Joseph Kony, but something held me back from going that bit further and purchasing the packages. Was I one of few or one of many?
As a journalism student I have found this whole campaign interesting to watch as it unfolds. As has been said before, something of this magnitude has never been done before, using digital media to reach so many people around the world and receiving such a strong response. I wish the Invisible Children all the best with their busy night ahead!!
Tuesday, 17 April 2012
HOW TO LOSE WEIGHT FAST, through the nose?
Reading the news today I came across one of the latest diet fads to hit the market. Every new method I read or hear about seems crazier than the last but this one just about takes the cake. Eating through a nasal tube! This idea may seem pretty extreme and a little gross but many brides to be are trying this 'crash diet' method to lose 5-10 kg before their big day. Women follow this 'diet' for about 10 days in which they consume a mere 800 calories per day, less than half of what most people should eat in a day!
Basically its just another stupid starvation diet that does more damage than good in the long run. In a world where time is short and people don't have the time or can't be bothered to live a healthy lifestyle these sorts of weight loss methods continue to emerge, each one seeming more ridiculous and more unhealthy than the last.
Have you heard
of these?
The Cabbage Soup diet - Eating nothing but cabbage soup for seven days
Grapefruit diet or Hollywood diet - A high protein, low carb diet that incorporates half a grapefruit with every meal eaten. It is claimed that grapefruit has a fat burning enzyme that will burn calories in high fibre foods. This diet is taken in 12 day intervals, with 2 days off in between.
The Blood Type Diet - This diet claims that according to a person's blood type they need to eat different foods. The evidence behind this is very limited
And finally.... The Lemon Juice diet or Master Cleanse. With this diet no food is allowed to be consumed just herbal tea and lemon water. With a diet like this of course you're gonna lose some weight! Its pure starvation!! Click on the link below to watch Current Affairs expose on this infamous diet used by many Hollywood stars.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7006mQQ0Y0w&feature=player_embedded#!
Basically its just another stupid starvation diet that does more damage than good in the long run. In a world where time is short and people don't have the time or can't be bothered to live a healthy lifestyle these sorts of weight loss methods continue to emerge, each one seeming more ridiculous and more unhealthy than the last.
Have you heard
of these?
The Cabbage Soup diet - Eating nothing but cabbage soup for seven days
Grapefruit diet or Hollywood diet - A high protein, low carb diet that incorporates half a grapefruit with every meal eaten. It is claimed that grapefruit has a fat burning enzyme that will burn calories in high fibre foods. This diet is taken in 12 day intervals, with 2 days off in between.
The Blood Type Diet - This diet claims that according to a person's blood type they need to eat different foods. The evidence behind this is very limited
And finally.... The Lemon Juice diet or Master Cleanse. With this diet no food is allowed to be consumed just herbal tea and lemon water. With a diet like this of course you're gonna lose some weight! Its pure starvation!! Click on the link below to watch Current Affairs expose on this infamous diet used by many Hollywood stars.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7006mQQ0Y0w&feature=player_embedded#!
Lecture 7 - Public Media
Lecture 7 was about the public media with particular emphasis on the two main players in Australia: ABC and SBS. For the first ten years of my life the only TV I ever watched was ABC because that was the only channel we picked up (I lived out in the country). I can still remember the first few weeks when we got the other channels like Ten, WIN, Seven and SBS. My mum used to get so annoyed at all the adds. Over time of course my family gradually began to watch more of the commercialized stuff and nowadays we watch ABC a lot less (though this may also be because I'm no longer a kid!) except the odd science program or Australian Story. I do however believe that the ABC and SBS show far more important material than any of the commercial channels and their value to society is far greater.
In the lecture we discovered that public media's main goal is to serve and engage the public. Because it is not driven by the need to create profit the material it gives us is very different. It allows for minority groups, supports the public and democratic processes and has no other vested interest other than its main goal. One of the big questions raised was, if public media isn't funded by advertisers then where does it get the money to function at all? The answer: it is owned by us, the public!
Now I have heard many people say they never watch ABC or SBS because they find it boring. Maybe for a lot of young people reality tv shows, and American sitcoms are more entertaining but surely there must come a time when everyone gets sick of this sort of stuff and wants something they know is real. I think that this is what makes public media so special. Because it has no agenda it goes where other media doesn't. It was the ABC that brought us the story of exported cattle that created such an upheaval across the country. When stories like these break, stories that have real meaning and get people up and talking and protesting we can see the importance of public media.
I think it is important to note that while commercial media is all about showing us what we want to see most, public media often shows us what we need to see most. I believe both serve a vital purpose in society and have an important role to play. When I think about the different channels I watch, it is a hefty mix of both types and I enjoy both equally for different reasons. But my respect for the public media channels is much greater and I would love to one day join one of them as a journalist!
In the lecture we discovered that public media's main goal is to serve and engage the public. Because it is not driven by the need to create profit the material it gives us is very different. It allows for minority groups, supports the public and democratic processes and has no other vested interest other than its main goal. One of the big questions raised was, if public media isn't funded by advertisers then where does it get the money to function at all? The answer: it is owned by us, the public!
Now I have heard many people say they never watch ABC or SBS because they find it boring. Maybe for a lot of young people reality tv shows, and American sitcoms are more entertaining but surely there must come a time when everyone gets sick of this sort of stuff and wants something they know is real. I think that this is what makes public media so special. Because it has no agenda it goes where other media doesn't. It was the ABC that brought us the story of exported cattle that created such an upheaval across the country. When stories like these break, stories that have real meaning and get people up and talking and protesting we can see the importance of public media.
I think it is important to note that while commercial media is all about showing us what we want to see most, public media often shows us what we need to see most. I believe both serve a vital purpose in society and have an important role to play. When I think about the different channels I watch, it is a hefty mix of both types and I enjoy both equally for different reasons. But my respect for the public media channels is much greater and I would love to one day join one of them as a journalist!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)